FOX "Feminist" Asserts "Female Rapes Hard to Find Among All-Male Populations", In Between Mouthfuls of Rupert Murdoch's Greasy Cock
Only Fox "news" could find a "feminist" "journalist" willing to write an article compelling its readers to oppose the renewal of the Violence Against Women Act, based on the idea that the legislation is unfairly exclusive of (heterosexual) men. According to Wendy McElroy:
"When male victims protested their exclusion, VAWA advocates dismissed them as statistically insignificant. Today, an impressive body of research shows that men constitute anywhere from 36 to 50 percent of domestic violence victims."
Thirty-six to fifty percent my ass. Her "impressive body of research" was some random, obscure, and confusing study which analyzed a few hundred cases. Meanwhile, if you google "domestic violence statistics" and read any of the first thousand or so entries you'll find that basically a grillion percent of serious domestic violence is committed by men on women, not the other way around.
"(The situation is similar with rape. Women are the victims only if you exclude prisons where male rape is prevalent.)"
THAT REEKS OF SUCH BULLSHIT. There are turd stews made with chunks of Chris Farley's exhumed corpse that smell better than that argument.
I asked my six-month-old fetus, "Hey - do you think that in determining the percent of men vs women as rape victims that a study should include rapes that occur within a population that is of a single sex?"
And my fetus replied, "Of course not - even I know that and I haven't even formed eyelids yet. I mean, sure, if you take an all-male population, the number of rapes on women will be unsurprisingly low. But add just one unguarded vagina into that population and watch the numbers skew violently in the opposite direction. That is, if you are counting the number of times the female is raped, as opposed to the number of females raped. In the case of the latter, the number of females raped would only be one (1), but the number of males raped would decrease by the thousands. Hey, why don't you print out that article and shove it up your hole so we can both see what it feels like to be raped of our dignity, common sense, and respect for journalism by Ms. McElroy."
That fetus was so wise. I almost regret partial-birth aborting it.
"When male victims protested their exclusion, VAWA advocates dismissed them as statistically insignificant. Today, an impressive body of research shows that men constitute anywhere from 36 to 50 percent of domestic violence victims."
Thirty-six to fifty percent my ass. Her "impressive body of research" was some random, obscure, and confusing study which analyzed a few hundred cases. Meanwhile, if you google "domestic violence statistics" and read any of the first thousand or so entries you'll find that basically a grillion percent of serious domestic violence is committed by men on women, not the other way around.
"(The situation is similar with rape. Women are the victims only if you exclude prisons where male rape is prevalent.)"
THAT REEKS OF SUCH BULLSHIT. There are turd stews made with chunks of Chris Farley's exhumed corpse that smell better than that argument.
I asked my six-month-old fetus, "Hey - do you think that in determining the percent of men vs women as rape victims that a study should include rapes that occur within a population that is of a single sex?"
And my fetus replied, "Of course not - even I know that and I haven't even formed eyelids yet. I mean, sure, if you take an all-male population, the number of rapes on women will be unsurprisingly low. But add just one unguarded vagina into that population and watch the numbers skew violently in the opposite direction. That is, if you are counting the number of times the female is raped, as opposed to the number of females raped. In the case of the latter, the number of females raped would only be one (1), but the number of males raped would decrease by the thousands. Hey, why don't you print out that article and shove it up your hole so we can both see what it feels like to be raped of our dignity, common sense, and respect for journalism by Ms. McElroy."
That fetus was so wise. I almost regret partial-birth aborting it.
3 Comments:
*laugh* Nice commentary; I agree, her argument is weak.
I'd just like to point out a slight grammatical error in your first sentence:
Only Fox "news" could find a "feminist" "journalist" willing to write an article compelling it's readers to oppose the renewal of the Violence Against Women Act...
Unless you meant to say "an article compelling it is readers," then "it's" needs to be a possessive "its." :) Thanks.
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Good catch, um, dawg. You win the grammatical equivalent of a Grammy and the mistake shall be corrected. Thanks!
Post a Comment
<< Home